Catalog
| Issuer | Holy Roman Empire |
|---|---|
| Year | 1002-1024 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | 1 Denier (Pfennig) |
| Currency | Denier (843-1385) |
| Composition | Silver |
| Weight | |
| Diameter | |
| Thickness | |
| Shape | Round (irregular) |
| Technique | Hammered |
| Orientation | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Engraver(s) | |
| In circulation to | |
| Reference(s) | Kluge Kar#79, Dann Sa#916 |
| Obverse description | Crowned bust facing right, legend around. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering |
+ HEINRICVS REX (Translation: King Henry.) |
| Reverse description | Temple with crosslet within, legend around. |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering |
ARGENTINA (Translation: Strasbourg.) |
| Edge | |
| Mint | |
| Mintage |
ND (1002-1024) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 2216696750 |
| Additional information |
Historical Context: This Denier, issued from the Strasbourg mint between 1002 and 1024, dates to the reign of Henry II, the last Ottonian Holy Roman Emperor. His tenure was marked by vigorous consolidation of imperial authority, particularly through ecclesiastical appointments. As a significant imperial city, Strasbourg's minting output was vital for regional commerce, demonstrating imperial reach. These coins underscore the late Ottonian period, preceding the Salian dynasty's ascendancy.
Artistry: The Denier's design exemplifies early Romanesque numismatic art, characterized by stylized, symbolic representations. While the engraver remains anonymous, typical for the period, the prominent "temple" motif on the reverse is key. This stylized façade, often depicting a church, symbolized imperial and divine authority, reinforcing Henry II's sacral kingship. The obverse generally features the emperor's name and title, often surrounding a cross.
Technical/Grading: From a technical perspective, these deniers were struck on relatively broad, thin silver flans, often exhibiting some irregularity. Key high-points for evaluation include the clarity of the temple's roofline, columns, and any internal details, alongside the legibility of the legends. Due to early striking methods, off-center strikes and flatness, particularly on outer legends, are common. Well-centered examples with sharp central motifs and clear legends are highly prized.