See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Henry II Mainz mint, arabic inscription

Issuer Holy Roman Empire
Year 1002-1024
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field displays a stylized architectural or cross-like device composed of pellets and geometric forms arranged symmetrically, typical of Ottonian-Salian pfennig coinage. The design features a cross motif with pellets at intersections and in the angles, rendered in low relief characteristic of hammered silver coinage of the period. The surrounding circumscription reads + HEINRICVS, identifying the issuer as Emperor Henry II. The flan is irregular and slightly convex, with weak areas of strike consistent with early eleventh-century German mint production. The overall design follows the stylized, abstract architectural type common to Mainz imperial deniers of this reign.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering + HEINRICVS
(Translation: Henry.)
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Henry II, crowned emperor in 1014, authorized a remarkable series of deniers at Mainz that carried Arabic Kufic inscriptions — a direct consequence of the intensive silver trade flowing through the empire from Islamic dirhams. Merchants and moneyers working along established trade routes had grown so accustomed to Arabic coinage that imitative legends carried genuine commercial credibility in certain markets.

Kluge Kar#76 is among the better-documented of these Ottonian-era imitative types, though the specific Arabic text is garbled rather than semantically coherent — copied by craftsmen who could not read it.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE