Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denier - Conrad II Mainz mint, cross

Uitgever Holy Roman Empire
Jaar 1024-1039
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde 1 Denier (Pfennig)
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Central plain cross dividing the field into four quadrants, each containing a pellet or annulet. The design is executed in a crude, archaic hammered style typical of Ottonian-Salian imperial coinage, with the cross arms extending nearly to the beaded or plain border. The flan is irregular and slightly concave.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Latin
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Conrad II's election as Holy Roman Emperor in 1024 followed a disputed succession after the death of Henry II, who left no heir. The Mainz archbishopric held considerable minting authority during this period, operating under imperial grant rather than purely ecclesiastical privilege — a distinction that generated ongoing jurisdictional friction between the archbishops and the imperial court throughout the eleventh century.

Dann Sa#790 is a well-documented type within the Salian coinage corpus, though die variation across Conrad's fifteen-year reign means attribution of individual specimens sometimes relies on subtle metrological differences rather than visual diagnostics alone.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT