See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier - Charles III monastery of Saint Dionysius

Issuer West Francia, Kingdom of
Year 898-923
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Denier (1⁄240)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse displays a two-line inscription in the field, arranged horizontally and separated by beaded lines above and below. Two groups of three pellets, each arranged in a triangular formation, flank the central inscription at the upper and lower registers, serving as decorative punctuation devices. The overall composition is characteristic of monastic mint issues of the Carolingian period, associating the coinage with the Abbey of Saint-Denis.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Charles III — "the Simple" — came to power in circumstances that required aggressive coalition-building with ecclesiastical institutions. The monastery of Saint-Denis had been a Carolingian royal foundation since the seventh century, and the right to strike coin in its name was both a fiscal privilege and a political signal. These deniers circulated in the Île-de-France at a moment when Carolingian royal authority was being actively contested by the Robertian dynasty, whose own territorial grip on the region made every assertion of Charles's legitimacy consequential.

The multiple catalog references here — Prou, Gariel, Morrison, PA — reflect decades of scholarly disagreement over precise attribution within the Saint-Denis series.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE