Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Kingdom of Bohemia |
|---|---|
| Year | 1034-1050 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Denier |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Central cross pattée within a beaded inner circle, with four smaller crosses in the cardinal quadrants forming a quincunx arrangement. The field between the inner and outer beaded border is occupied by the retrograde or irregular Latin legend BRACISLAV, referencing Duke Bretislaus I of Bohemia. The overall design is characteristic of Bohemian deniers of the early Přemyslid period, showing strong influence from Ottonian and Bavarian coinage traditions. The die-cutting is bold and slightly irregular, consistent with hand-hammered medieval minting practice. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | WENCESNVS (Translation: Wenceslaus) |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Bretislav I consolidated Bohemian territory aggressively during his reign, briefly seizing Silesia, Moravia, and much of Poland in the early 1030s — campaigns that required substantial military financing and likely drove the volume of his minting activity. His coinage circulated across a politically unstable region where borders shifted with each campaign season.
Cach 310 is among the more consistently documented types of his output, though die-link studies remain incomplete and attribution of individual specimens sometimes relies on provenance as much as typology.