Catalogus
Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis
of registreer met e-mail
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
Denier Bracteate - Otto
| Uitgever | Hessen, Landgraviate of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1308-1326 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | 0.35 g |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Stylized lion passant to right, rendered in low relief within a beaded inner circle, the body depicted in a schematic medieval manner characteristic of Hessian bracteate coinage. Six rosettes distributed symmetrically to either side of the lion in the field. The entire design is enclosed within a plain outer border with an additional ring of pellets, consistent with the hammered bracteate technique of the early fourteenth century. |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Plain |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Otto I of Hesse ruled during a period when thin, single-sided bracteate coinage was already declining across the German lands in favor of thicker, two-sided pfennigs. His issues are transitional pieces, struck with shallow dies on wafer-thin flans that distort easily — which explains why well-preserved examples are genuinely scarce. The Schütz I#63 variety designation signals a die deviation from the principal recorded type, though the precise nature of that variation is not always consistently documented across collections.