Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Greater Poland, Duchy of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1138-1202 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Denier |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Facing bust of the ruler, rendered in a schematic, archaic style typical of early Polish medieval bracteates, enclosed within a square beaded inner frame. The effigy depicts a frontal portrait with simplified facial features, wearing a diadem or crown indicated by a cross above the head. The square frame is itself surrounded by an outer beaded border following the irregular round flan. The overall composition is characteristic of the Gniezno or Kalisz minting tradition under Mieszko III the Old, with a rough yet expressive artistic execution. |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | ND (1138-1202) |
| Additional information |
Mieszko III ruled Greater Poland twice — expelled by his own nobles in 1177, he spent years in exile before reclaiming power, a dynastic instability that directly shaped the fragmentary nature of his coinage. Bracteates of this type were struck on thin, single-sided flans precisely because the technology allowed rapid, low-cost production suited to a fragmented Piast realm where mint authority shifted with political fortune.
Kop#87 attributions to either Gniezno or Kalisz reflect genuine scholarly uncertainty — both mints were active under Mieszko, and die evidence has not conclusively separated their output.