See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier Bracteate - Louis II of Bayern

Issuer Duchy of Upper Bavaria
Year 1268-1294
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Hammered (bracteate)
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description As a bracteate, the reverse presents an incuse mirror image of the obverse design, showing the crowned facing head of the Duke in negative relief. The incuse impression of the crown, facial features, and flanking ornamental scrolls are clearly discernible, characteristic of the single-die hammered bracteate technique employed throughout the Duchy of Upper Bavaria during the reign of Louis II (1253-1294). The surface displays typical patination and encrustation consistent with extended burial or circulation.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1268-1294)
Additional information

Louis II ruled Upper Bavaria following the partition of 1255, which split the Wittelsbach holdings between the Upper and Lower Bavarian lines — a division that would shape regional coinage for generations. The bracteate fabric itself was already archaic by this period; most German territories had shifted toward thicker, two-sided pfennigs, but certain Bavarian and Franconian mints clung to the thin single-sided format well into the late thirteenth century. The Berger and Bohnenberger references place this piece firmly within a documented typological sequence, though precise mint attribution within Louis's territories remains unresolved in the literature.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE