See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Denier Bracteate - John I

Issuer Palatinate-Zweibrücken, Duchy of
Year 1569-1604
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Central field displays a triangular shield bearing the three-fold arms of Palatinate-Zweibrücken, rendered in low relief characteristic of bracteate coinage. The shield is enclosed within a rectangular frame or border. The initials I P (standing for Johann Pfalzgraf) appear above the shield, identifying the issuing authority as Duke Johann I of Palatinate-Zweibrücken. The overall design is simply executed in the late 16th-century hammered bracteate tradition, with a slightly irregular flan typical of the period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (1569-1604)
Additional information

John I ruled Palatinate-Zweibrücken from 1569 until his death in 1604, a tenure marked by the duchy's firm Calvinist turn — he expelled Lutheran clergy and enforced Reformed doctrine with unusual consistency for a small Rhenish territory. The bracteate denier itself is an anachronism by this date; thin single-sided silver pfennig-weight pieces of this type were a medieval convention that persisted in certain German territories well past their technological and economic usefulness, largely because local exchange habits changed more slowly than minting practice.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE