目录
为什么需要注册?只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证!
| 正面描述 | Central field features a rampant lion passant within a raised circular beaded ring, the animal rendered in a bold, stylized medieval manner. Surrounding the central medallion, a broad outer band is decorated with alternating crescent moon and six-petalled rosette motifs arranged symmetrically around the circumference. The overall design is characteristic of the Eger (Cheb) bracteate-influenced pfennig tradition of the late 13th century, struck by hand with irregular flan edges. No legend is present, consistent with the anonymous issue attribution. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | As a bracteate-style hammered denier, the reverse displays a mirror-image incuse impression of the obverse design, showing the outline of the central lion motif and the surrounding crescent and rosette border in negative relief. The surface is characteristically uneven, typical of hammered single-sided or thin-flan coinage from the Eger mint of the 13th century. No inscriptions or additional design elements are present on the reverse. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
Eger — modern Cheb in the Czech Republic — was a direct imperial holding under the Hohenstaufen, and coins struck there carried no ruler's name precisely because they derived authority from the emperor himself rather than any delegated lord. The anonymous style was a deliberate administrative choice, not an oversight. After the extinction of the Hohenstaufen line in 1268, Eger passed through disputed hands before Rudolf I formally reasserted imperial control in 1276, and production of these deniers likely straddled that turbulent transition.