Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denier - Anonymous

Uitgever Bishopric of Osnabrück
Jaar 1075-1125
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Round (irregular)
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Central cross pattée dividing the field into four quadrants, each containing a large pellet or annulet. A V-shaped or chevron motif surmounts the upper arm of the cross. The surrounding legend, rendered in crude Romanesque lettering, reads OSNINHVGGE, enclosed between an inner beaded border and the coin's irregular rim.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde OSNINHVGGE
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

The anonymous deniers of Osnabrück belong to a period when the bishop held coinage rights granted by the Salian emperors, rights that became deeply contested during the Investiture Controversy. The diocese was caught directly in that conflict — Bishop Benno II of Osnabrück, who died in 1088, was one of the few German prelates who managed to navigate loyalty to Henry IV without permanently alienating the papal party, a political tightrope that kept the see functional while neighboring ecclesiastical mints collapsed into factional paralysis.

The anonymous attribution reflects a broader minting practice in the lower Saxon region where episcopal identity was subordinated to institutional authority of the see itself rather than the sitting bishop.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT