Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Moscow, Grand principality of |
|---|---|
| Year | 1412-1420 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Denga (0.005) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Cyrillic |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A pseudo-Arabic or imitation Tatar legend fills the central field, composed of stylized Arabic script elements that do not form a coherent readable text, reflecting the Muscovite practice of imitating Mongol-Tatar coinage designs. The inscription is arranged in multiple registers within the field, bordered by a beaded or dotted inner circle. Globular pellets are interspersed throughout the design in a manner consistent with the HP II #1405 series type. The overall composition reflects the political and cultural influences of the Golden Horde on early Muscovite coinage. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Vasily I inherited a Moscow already experimenting with coinage his father Dmitry Donskoy had introduced in the 1380s, partly in imitation of Tatar Khan issues — a political necessity given Moscow's continued tribute obligations to the Golden Horde. The Arabic inscriptions on these dengas were not functional text but imitative gibberish, copied by die-cutters who had no knowledge of the script. This was deliberate: it signaled nominal Tatar legitimacy while asserting a distinctly Muscovite iconographic program on the opposing side.
HP II#1565 is among the more precisely attributed varieties in the Hanatsevich-Petrunin corpus for this reign, placing it within a narrow window of Vasily's later output before his death in 1425.