Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Moscow, Grand principality of |
|---|---|
| Year | |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | 1 Denga (0.005) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | The reverse bears a multi-line Arabic inscription filling the field, a characteristic feature of early Muscovite dengas struck in imitation of or acknowledgment of Golden Horde monetary authority. The legend references Sultan Toktamysh Khan, reflecting the political relationship between the Grand Principality of Moscow and the Tatar overlords of the period. The script is neatly arranged across the flan, with no additional decorative elements. The flan is irregular in shape, consistent with wire-cut hammered technique. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Vasily I ruled Moscow from 1389 to 1425, a period when the principality was still nominally tributary to the Golden Horde. The Arabic legends on Moscow dengas of this period are not purely decorative — they reflect the political reality of Mongol suzerainty, mimicking the coinage of the Horde to signal legitimacy within a tribute economy. Some scholars read them as garbled Tatar phrases, others as near-meaningless imitations of earlier Jochid types.
HP II#1350 places this among the more precisely catalogued varieties in Hanaberg-Petrov's corpus, though attribution within Vasily I's issues remains contested given die-link studies are ongoing.