| Uitgever | Mikulin, Principality of |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1435-1455 |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Waarde | 1 Denga (1/200) |
| Valuta | Denga (1339-1485) |
| Samenstelling | Silver |
| Gewicht | |
| Diameter | |
| Dikte | |
| Vorm | Irregular |
| Techniek | |
| Oriëntatie | |
| Graveur(s) | |
| In omloop tot | |
| Referentie(s) |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | |
| Opschrift voorzijde | |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | |
| Schrift keerzijde | |
| Opschrift keerzijde | |
| Rand | Smooth |
| Muntplaats | |
| Oplage |
ND (1435-1455) - - |
| Numisquare-ID | 1982442220 |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Historical Context: This Denga, issued by Fedor Fedorovich of the Principality of Mikulin between 1435 and 1455, emerges from a tumultuous period in Rus' history. Mikulin, a minor principality situated between the rising power of Moscow and the established Grand Principality of Tver, frequently found itself navigating complex political allegiances. The issuance of its own coinage by Fedor Fedorovich, a relatively obscure local ruler, signifies a crucial assertion of sovereign authority and economic independence amidst the ongoing fragmentation and the waning influence of the Golden Horde.
Artistry: The artistic execution of this Denga reflects the characteristic style of early Rus' coinage, often lacking the refinement seen in Western European issues but rich in symbolic meaning. While no specific engraver is recorded, the design typically features a stylized rider, often interpreted as the prince or a saint, on the obverse, and a Cyrillic legend detailing the ruler's name, Fedor Fedorovich, and title on the reverse. The aesthetic is utilitarian, prioritizing legibility of the ruler's claim over intricate detail, indicative of a regional mint's capabilities.
Technical/Grading: Typical of 15th-century Rus' dendy, this coin was likely struck on an irregular, often crudely prepared silver flan. High points for wear or strike weakness would include the rider's head, the horse's extremities, and the outer edges of the Cyrillic legend. Common technical characteristics include off-center strikes, variable pressure leading to uneven relief, and occasional planchet cracks. A well-struck example would exhibit clear details of the rider and a fully legible legend, free from significant doubling or flat areas.