Каталог
| Эмитент | Moscow, Grand principality of |
|---|---|
| Год | 1382 |
| Тип | Standard circulation coin |
| Номинал | 1 Denga (0.005) |
| Валюта | Rouble (1381-1534) |
| Состав | Silver |
| Вес | |
| Диаметр | |
| Толщина | |
| Форма | Round (irregular) |
| Техника | Hammered |
| Ориентация | |
| Гравёр(ы) | |
| В обращении до | |
| Каталожные номера |
| Описание аверса | The image of an armed Prince. Title. |
|---|---|
| Письменность аверса | |
| Надписи аверса | |
| Описание реверса | |
| Письменность реверса | |
| Надписи реверса | |
| Гурт | |
| Монетный двор | |
| Тираж |
ND (1382) - - |
| ID Numisquare | 2068038070 |
| Дополнительная информация |
Historical Context: Dmitry Ivanovich Donskoy (r. 1359-1389) was a transformative figure for the Grand Principality of Moscow. The 1382 denga dates to the immediate aftermath of the pivotal Battle of Kulikovo (1380), a crucial victory against the Golden Horde that solidified Moscow's leadership. Despite a subsequent punitive raid by Tokhtamysh, Donskoy’s reign marked significant consolidation and growing assertion of independence from Tatar overlordship, reflected in Muscovite coinage autonomy. This coin symbolizes a critical juncture in early Russian state formation.
Artistry: The artistry of this denga reflects the developing medieval Russian numismatic tradition. Engravers were anonymous local craftsmen, working within a stylistic school characterized by directness and functional representation. Common designs for Donskoy’s coinage include a mounted warrior with a sword or hawk, or an animal like a lion. These motifs, while often simplified, conveyed authority and local identity, distinguishing Muscovite issues from earlier Tatar-influenced coinage. Execution, though varying, was functional for its time.
Technical/Grading: Technical strike qualities for 14th-century Muscovite dengas are inherently variable due to the hammer-striking process on hand-cut silver flans. High-points, such as the rider’s head, weapon, or horse’s features, often show weakness or flatness. Clarity of the Cyrillic legends is a critical grading factor, as off-centering and double-striking are common. The irregular flan shape and thin fabric are characteristic. A well-struck example exhibits strong detail on the central motif and legible legends, despite typical flan imperfections.