Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Denarius

Uitgever Arsaos
Jaar 204 BC - 154 BC
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde A mounted warrior galloping vigorously to the right, rendered in characteristic Celtiberian style. The rider, shown with a dotted rosette headdress, raises an arrow or javelin in his right hand in a striking pose, while the horse is depicted with animated, outstretched legs conveying speed and energy. A Iberian legend in semi-circular arrangement appears in the exergue below the horse. The overall composition reflects the standard Hispano-Roman equestrian type adopted by Celtiberian city-state mints.
Schrift keerzijde Iberian (Levantine)
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Arsaos was one of several semi-autonomous Iberian chieftains permitted by Rome to strike silver coinage following the Second Punic War, a pragmatic arrangement that allowed local economies to function without direct Roman mint intervention. The precise identification of Arsaos as a geographic or dynastic entity remains debated — the name appears in Iberian script on the coinage itself but has no surviving corroborating literary source.

The fifty-year date range reflects scholarly inference from die links and stylistic progression rather than any documented historical anchor.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT