Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Arsaos |
|---|---|
| Year | 204 BC - 154 BC |
| Type | Standard circulation coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | A mounted warrior galloping vigorously to the right, rendered in characteristic Celtiberian style. The rider, shown with a dotted rosette headdress, raises an arrow or javelin in his right hand in a striking pose, while the horse is depicted with animated, outstretched legs conveying speed and energy. A Iberian legend in semi-circular arrangement appears in the exergue below the horse. The overall composition reflects the standard Hispano-Roman equestrian type adopted by Celtiberian city-state mints. |
| Reverse script | Iberian (Levantine) |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Arsaos was one of several semi-autonomous Iberian chieftains permitted by Rome to strike silver coinage following the Second Punic War, a pragmatic arrangement that allowed local economies to function without direct Roman mint intervention. The precise identification of Arsaos as a geographic or dynastic entity remains debated — the name appears in Iberian script on the coinage itself but has no surviving corroborating literary source.
The fifty-year date range reflects scholarly inference from die links and stylistic progression rather than any documented historical anchor.