Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Royal Mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 1992-1997 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Milled |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Milled with incuse lettering: DECUS ET TUTAMENT |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | 1992 1995 1996 1997 |
| Additional information |
The round pound was famously counterfeited at scale throughout its 1983–2017 run — by some Treasury estimates, as many as one in thirty coins in circulation by the mid-2000s were fake. The Welsh Dragon reverse, issued across several years in the 1990s, was among the more frequently replicated types, partly because nickel brass is relatively easy to approximate in weight and color with cheap alloys.
This piece is the counterfeit, not the genuine article. The Royal Mint cited the vulnerability of the round pound's single-layer construction to exactly this problem when lobbying for the bimetallic replacement introduced in 2017.