目录
| 发行方 | Dikaia |
|---|---|
| 年份 | 400 BC - 350 BC |
| 类型 | Standard circulation coin |
| 面值 | |
| 货币 | Drachm |
| 材质 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 1.08 g |
| 直径 | 11 mm |
| 厚度 | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 制作工艺 | Hammered |
| 方向 | Variable alignment ↺ |
| 雕刻师 | |
| 流通至 | |
| 参考资料 | Schönert Bisanthe#– |
| 正面描述 | Head of Herakles to right, wearing lion`s skin headdress. |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | |
| 正面铭文 | |
| 背面描述 | Bull`s head to right. |
| 背面文字 | Greek |
| 背面铭文 |
ΔIKAIOΠ (Translation: Dikaia) |
| 边缘 | |
| 铸币厂 | |
| 铸造量 |
ND (400 BC - 350 BC) - - |
| Numisquare 编号 | 8923890610 |
| 附加信息 |
Historical Context: This Chalkous coin, issued by the city-state of Dikaia between 400 and 350 BC, reflects a pivotal era in Thracian history. Dikaia, a Greek colony of Teos situated on the northern Aegean coast, navigated a complex geopolitical landscape following the Peloponnesian War. While not ruled by a single monarch, the city-state's civic authorities oversaw its minting operations. The production of small bronze denominations like the Chalkous during this late Classical period signifies a mature and localized monetary economy, crucial for facilitating everyday transactions amidst shifting regional powers and increasing demand for small change.
Artistry: The artistic execution of this Chalkous, characteristic of smaller bronze issues from Dikaia, likely originated from an anonymous local engraver. Stylistically, it aligns with the Late Classical Greek tradition, emphasizing naturalism within the constraints of its diminutive size. Common designs for Dikaian bronze coinage feature the head of Dionysus, often wreathed with ivy or vine leaves, on the obverse. The reverse typically displays a simplified symbol such as a grape bunch or a kantharos, directly referencing the city's strong cultic ties to Dionysus and its prominent viticultural economy.
Technical/Grading: Weighing 1.08 grams and measuring 11 millimeters, this Chalkous is a small, utilitarian coin. For a Dionysus head design, the high-points would typically be the forehead, nose, and the prominent elements of the hair and wreath. Given the nature of small bronze coinage from this period, technical strike qualities can vary significantly. Common issues include minor off-centering, uneven strike pressure leading to areas of weakness, and evidence of die wear, particularly on peripheral details. The flan itself often exhibits an irregular shape, consistent with mass production rather than precision.