Chalkon

Đơn vị phát hành Peparethos
Năm 361 BC - 340 BC
Loại Standard circulation coin
Mệnh giá Chalkon (1⁄48)
Tiền tệ Drachm
Chất liệu Bronze
Trọng lượng 2.09 g
Đường kính 13.0 mm
Độ dày
Hình dạng Round (irregular)
Kỹ thuật Hammered
Hướng
Nghệ nhân khắc
Lưu hành đến
Tài liệu tham khảo SNG Copenhagen#359
Mô tả mặt trước Head of bearded Dionysos to right, wearing ivy wreath
Chữ viết mặt trước
Chữ khắc mặt trước
Mô tả mặt sau High-handled Kantharos from which grow two vine tendrils with a bunch of grapes hanging from each; above, ivy leaf
Chữ viết mặt sau Greek
Chữ khắc mặt sau ΠΕ
Cạnh
Xưởng đúc
Số lượng đúc ND (361 BC - 340 BC) - -
ID Numisquare 3717761480
Thông tin bổ sung

Historical Context: This Chalkon, issued by the Aegean island polis of Peparethos (361-340 BC), dates to a turbulent period. Following Athenian decline, Peparethos maintained strategic importance and economic vitality through maritime trade. This era saw the rise of Macedonian power under Philip II. Peparethos minted its own coinage to facilitate local commerce and assert autonomy, with the Chalkon serving as a crucial small denomination for daily transactions.

Artistry: No specific engraver is attributed to this Chalkon, but its design reflects the Late Classical Greek stylistic school, emphasizing naturalism. Peparethian bronze coinage of this period, exemplified by SNG Copenhagen #359, typically features a prominent bunch of grapes on the obverse, symbolizing the island's viticulture. The reverse often depicts a marine motif, such as a dolphin, underscoring Peparethos's maritime identity. The small flan constrained detailed artistry, yet aimed for recognizable local iconography.

Technical/Grading: Struck from bronze, this Chalkon weighs 2.09 grams and measures 13.0 millimeters. As a small denomination, bronze issues from this period often exhibit varying strike qualities. High-points for a grape motif would be the individual berries; for a dolphin, the head and dorsal fin. Collectors should anticipate potential off-centering, minor flan irregularities, and areas of weaker strike. A well-centered example with clear rendering of primary motifs and minimal wear on high-points would be considered exceptional.

×