See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Carolus 6th type with decorated shield

Issuer Besançon, Free imperial city of
Year 1622-1664
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Central field displays a large heraldic shield bearing the imperial double-headed eagle of the Holy Roman Empire, surmounted by an ornate crown and flanked by decorative foliate or scrollwork embellishments, all enclosed within a beaded inner circle. The shield design represents the arms of Charles V as claimed by the city of Besançon on its civic coinage. The surrounding legend reads + MONE : CIVI : BISVNTINÆ, identifying the coin as the official currency of the city of Besançon, with the inscription separated from the inner field by a rope-style border.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Besançon occupied a peculiar constitutional position throughout this period — a free imperial city within the Franche-Comté, surrounded by Burgundian territory under Spanish Habsburg control yet technically subordinate to the Holy Roman Emperor. The city jealously guarded its minting rights as one of the few concrete expressions of that autonomy, continuing to strike in the name of Charles V (Carolus) long after his death in 1558, a legal fiction maintained for well over a century because invoking a later ruler would have forced an uncomfortable acknowledgment of which sovereign actually held authority.

The forty-two year span of this type reflects institutional stubbornness as much as administrative continuity.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE