Katalog
| Emittent | Catuvellauni and Trinovantes tribes (Celtic Britain) |
|---|---|
| Jahr | 20 BC - 1 BC |
| Typ | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Nennwert | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Währung | Stater |
| Material | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Gewicht | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Durchmesser | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Dicke | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Form | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägetechnik | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Ausrichtung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Stempelschneider | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Im Umlauf bis | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Referenz(en) | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Aversbeschreibung | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
|---|---|
| Aversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Averslegende | TASC ANDO |
| Reversbeschreibung | A Capricorn-Pegasus hybrid creature depicted in a prancing or leaping pose facing right, combining the body of a horse with aquatic or draconic attributes characteristic of late Celtic coinage. The reverse field is populated with pellets and abstract decorative elements typical of Catuvellaunian bronze issues. A double pellet ring border frames the entire design, forming a decorative boundary around the flan edge. The rendering is vigorous and stylized, consistent with the native British coinage tradition of the late 1st century BC. |
| Reversschrift | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Reverslegende | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Rand | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Prägestätte | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Auflage | Anmelden um Details zu sehen |
| Zusätzliche Informationen |
Andoco is one of the more obscure rulers of the Catuvellauni, known almost entirely through his coinage rather than any historical record — no Roman or British source names him directly. His issues appear to overlap chronologically with Tasciovanus, suggesting either a subordinate or rival role within the tribal hierarchy, possibly governing a sub-region while the senior ruler held Verulamium. The "Ando Tasc" inscription linking both names on certain bronzes has generated considerable debate about whether this denotes co-rulership or a dynastic succession claim.