See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Besparalik - Mahmud I Kostantiniyye mint

Issuer Ottoman Imperial Mint
Year 1731
Type Log in to see details
Value 5 Para (1/8)
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description The obverse features the elaborate tughra (imperial cipher) of Sultan Mahmud I prominently occupying the upper field, rendered in intricate calligraphic relief with characteristic looping and diagonal strokes. Below the tughra, a two-line Arabic inscription in the field records the mint name Kostantiniyye (Constantinople) and the regnal year 1143 AH. Small floral or rosette ornaments are visible in the margins flanking the inscription. The overall design fills the flan in the dense, intertwined calligraphic style typical of early 18th-century Ottoman coinage.
Obverse script Arabic
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

The besparalik — literally "five paras" — emerged as a practical response to chronic small-change shortages that plagued Ottoman commerce throughout the early eighteenth century. Mahmud I came to power in 1730 following the Patrona Halil rebellion, a violent janissary-led revolt that deposed Ahmed III and briefly placed real power in the hands of a former Albanian sailor. The new sultan's early coinage reforms were as much about reasserting imperial financial credibility as meeting transactional need.

Kostantiniyye issues of this type were struck in billon at a fineness that reflected ongoing debasement pressures rather than any single policy decision.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE