See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

As TVRIASO

Issuer Turiaso
Year 29 BC - 27 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight 12.21 g
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A rider on horseback advancing left, the figure depicted with right arm raised in a gesture of salute or command, seated upon a horse shown in animated motion. The equestrian type is rendered in the Iberian tradition common to Hispanic provincial coinage of the late Republican and early Augustan period, with the horse's legs extended and the rider's cloak suggested by the silhouette. The mint name TVRIASO appears in the exergue in Latin capital letters, identifying the issuing city of Turiaso in the conventus Caesaraugustanus.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage ND (29 BC - 27 BC)
Additional information

Turiaso — modern Tarazona in Aragón — was among the Iberian municipalities granted the right to strike bronze coinage under Augustus in the immediate aftermath of the civil wars. The as issues of this period reflect Rome's pragmatic decentralization of small-denomination production in Hispania, where the central mint could not efficiently supply local transactional needs. The city's Latin status under Rome made it an authorized issuer, though the precise political mechanism behind each individual grant remains debated.

The RPC I chronology places this issue tightly within the transition from Octavian to the Augustan title, before 27 BC.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE