See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

As - Nero PONTIF MAX TR POT IMP P P S C

Issuer Roman Imperial Mint
Year 62-68
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) RIC I#416, OCRE#ric.1(2).ner.416
Obverse description Bare head of Emperor Nero facing right, with a small globe depicted at the base of the neck truncation, a detail alluding to his claim to universal dominion. The portrait renders Nero's characteristic fleshy features in a robust, slightly idealized style typical of Julio-Claudian imperial portraiture. The surrounding legend is incuse around the periphery of the flan in capital Latin letters. The coin exhibits the irregular, hand-struck flan characteristic of hammered Roman bronze coinage of this period.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Latin
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Nero's aes coinage was reorganized around 64 AD, when he reduced the weight standard for bronze and orichalcum denominations — a move tied directly to the fiscal strain of rebuilding Rome after the great fire and funding his Domus Aurea. The as dropped sharply in average weight, making heavier survivors like this piece likely products of the earlier part of the 62–68 window, before the reduction took full effect across the mints.

RIC I 416 is a Lugdunum product, distinguished from the Rome mint issues by subtle differences in fabric and style that specialists still debate.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE