Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 290-291 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Antoninianus (1) |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Latin |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | Log in om details te zien |
| Aanvullende informatie |
By the time this piece was struck, Diocletian had already spent years attempting to stabilize a currency system badly eroded by decades of debasement. The antoninianus itself was by this point a debased shadow of its original billon composition, and scholarly debate continues over whether issues from this transitional phase should be classified as silver at all — most contain only a thin surface wash over a billon or bronze core. The post-reform coinage Diocletian introduced around 294 with the argenteus would effectively render this denomination obsolete within a few years.