Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Roman Imperial Mint |
|---|---|
| Year | 291-292 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Antoninianus (1) |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Standing figure of Diocletian, draped and cuirassed, positioned to the right, extending his right hand holding a parazonium while receiving a small Victory statuette from Jupiter, who stands to the left grasping a long sceptre. The composition emphasizes the divine legitimacy of imperial authority, a hallmark of tetrarchic iconography. The two figures face one another in a symmetrical arrangement typical of the CONCORDIA MILITVM reverse type. The reverse legend CONCORDIA MILITVM arcs across the field, proclaiming harmony between the emperor and his troops. The exergue may carry a mint mark denoting the issuing workshop. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
By 291–292, Diocletian's reform of the antoninianus was already underway — the coin increasingly sheds its debased billon identity in favor of a higher silver content as part of the broader monetary restructuring that would culminate in the argenteus around 294. The CONCORDIA MILITVM type belongs to a deliberate propaganda campaign addressed directly to the army, issued at a moment when Diocletian was cementing the political architecture of the Tetrarchy and needed military loyalty formalized in metal.
RIC V.2 284A places this among the Lugdunum issues of the period.