See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Ant-nose Money 'Ghost face' type, without upper line

Issuer Chu, State of
Year 400 BC - 220 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value 1 Zhu
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description The reverse is entirely plain and uninscribed, presenting a flat, featureless field covered with an aged green and teal patina developed over centuries. The oval piercing at the lower end of the flan is visible from this side, consistent with the obverse perforation. Light casting striations and surface irregularities across the field attest to the primitive sand- or clay-mold casting methods employed during the Warring States period. No legends, devices, or symbols are present.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Ant-nose money — named by Western collectors for the vague facial resemblance of the incuse markings — functioned as the primary small-denomination currency of the Chu state across the middle and late Warring States period. Chu was unusual among the major states in rejecting the spade and knife coin forms favored elsewhere, instead issuing these small cast bronzes in a form that may derive from cowrie shell currency. The "ghost face" designation distinguishes this specific character configuration; the absence of the upper line marks it as a distinct casting variant, not a worn example of the lined type.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE