See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Ant-nose Money 'Ghost face' type, repeated inscription

Issuer Chu, State of
Year 400 BC - 220 BC
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Ant-nose money (401-220 BC)
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description A single archaic Chinese ideogram 貝 (Bei, meaning cowrie shell) appears in raised relief on the reverse, mirroring the obverse composition in the same primitive pictographic script of the Warring States period Chu state. The strokes form the same stylized geometric arrangement of lobes and horizontal bars, presenting a face-like aspect consistent with the 'Ghost Face' designation. The field surface is slightly convex and exhibits the characteristically rough, granular texture of ancient Chinese cast bronze coinage. A small raised dot or pellet is visible in the lower portion of the field.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Plain
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Ant-nose coins — so called by later collectors for their vaguely insectoid profile — were the primary small-denomination bronze currency of the Chu state during the Warring States period, circulating across a territory that at its peak stretched across much of south-central China. The "ghost face" designation refers to a specific reading of the cast inscription by later scholars, though debate over what the characters actually say has never been fully resolved. The repeated-inscription variety of Hartill 1.8 reflects a die or mold anomaly rather than an intentional design choice.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE