Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
Aes Formatum Chisel
| Issuer | |
|---|---|
| Year | 400 BC - 201 BC |
| Type | Proto coin |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Reverse entirely anepigraphic, presenting a plain, uninscribed cast bronze surface mirroring the obverse in form and finish. The face displays a similarly heavy patination of grey-green and brown encrustations, with no trace of any design, inscription, or symbolic device. Minor surface irregularities and casting pits are visible, consistent with primitive open or two-part mold casting methods employed in pre-monetary central Italy. The chisel-shaped outline remains clearly defined despite the advanced surface corrosion. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Before Rome standardized coinage, the Italian peninsula used irregular cast or worked bronze by weight — aes rude and its more refined successors — as the primary medium of exchange. Aes formatum represents an intermediate step: bronze worked into rough bar or chisel shapes, still exchanged gravimetrically rather than by face value. The chisel form in particular appears concentrated in central Italian hoards, suggesting regional preference rather than any centralized issuing authority.
No mint controlled this material. Its date range spans Rome's First and Second Punic Wars, yet it predates the Roman monetary system that those wars ultimately accelerated into existence.