Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Nicomedia (Bithynia and Pontus) |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 198-217 |
| Type | Log in om details te zien |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Bronze |
| Gewicht | Log in om details te zien |
| Diameter | Log in om details te zien |
| Dikte | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Techniek | Log in om details te zien |
| Oriëntatie | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Schrift voorzijde | Greek |
| Opschrift voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Schrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Rand | Log in om details te zien |
| Muntplaats | Log in om details te zien |
| Oplage | ND (198-217) |
| Aanvullende informatie |
Nicomedia's neokorate status — the honor of maintaining an imperial cult temple — was fiercely contested among Bithynian cities, and the city held it twice by Caracalla's reign, a distinction it broadcast aggressively on civic bronze coinage. The title ΔΙϹ ΝΕΩΚΟΡΩΝ (twice neokorate) was not merely ceremonial; it carried tax privileges and elevated the city's standing in provincial legal proceedings.
Nicomedia had wrested its first neokorate from rival Nicaea under Vespasian, and the two cities quarreled over precedence for generations — a dispute Dio Chrysostom addressed directly in his orations.