Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Æ27 - Septimius Severus ΝΙΚΑΙΕΩΝ

Uitgever Nicaea (Bithynia and Pontus)
Jaar 193-211
Type Standard circulation coin
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Draped bust of Caracalla as Caesar facing right, bare-headed with youthful features, presented in three-quarter frontal view. The paludamentum is rendered in folds across the lower bust, with visible drapery over the left shoulder. The Greek imperial legend encircles the portrait within a dotted border, identifying the prince by his full nomenclature.
Schrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift voorzijde Μ ΑΥΡ ΑΝΤΩΝΙΝΟϹ ΚΑΙ
(Translation: Marcus Aurelius Antoninus Caesar)
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Nicaea was one of the most politically active minting cities in Bithynia during the Severan period, and its civic bronze output under Septimius Severus reflects a municipality eager to signal loyalty to the new dynasty following the chaos of 193 AD — the Year of the Four Emperors. The city had backed the right horse.

Provincial bronzes from Nicaea are frequently underrepresented in major collections relative to their historical interest, partly because 19th-century collectors prioritized imperial coinage from Rome. The reference V.2#77010 places this within a well-documented but still incompletely die-studied series.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT