See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ26 - Maximinus ΚΙΑΝΩΝ

Issuer Cius (Bithynia and Pontus)
Year 235-238
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Round (irregular)
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Laureate, draped, and cuirassed bust of Emperor Maximinus Thrax facing right, presented three-quarter from the rear, with the paludamentum (military cloak) visible over the left shoulder and the articulated scales of the cuirass rendered in fine relief. The imperial effigy displays the characteristically broad features associated with Maximinus in provincial coinage. The Greek legend is disposed around the periphery of the flan, reading clockwise from the lower left.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Γ ΙΟΥ ΟΥΗΡ ΜΑΞΙΜΙΝΟϹ ΑΥΓ
(Translation: Gaius Julius Verus Maximinus Augustus)
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Cius — the modern Gemlik on the Marmara coast — was a Milesian foundation whose civic coinage under the Severans and their successors followed the standard Bithynian provincial pattern. Maximinus Thrax, the issuing emperor here, never visited the eastern provinces; his entire reign was consumed by campaigns on the Rhine and Danube frontiers and, ultimately, the civil war that killed him outside Aquileia in 238. Provincial bronzes struck in his name are consequently thin on administrative context — local magistrates issued them essentially on civic initiative, with the imperial portrait functioning more as a loyalty marker than any product of central mint policy.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE