Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Nicomedia (Bithynia and Pontus) |
|---|---|
| Year | 222-235 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Greek |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | ΤΡΙϹ ΝΕΩΚΟΡΩΝ ΝΙΚΟΜΗΔΕΩΝ (Translation: thrice neocorate of the Nicomedians) |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Nicomedia's claim to the title ΤΡΙϹ ΝΕΩΚΟΡΩΝ — "thrice temple warden" — was bitterly contested by its rival Nicaea, and the two cities spent decades lobbying emperors and the Roman Senate for neokorate honors. Nicomedia secured its third neokorate under Elagabalus, and Severus Alexander's accession did nothing to diminish the city's eagerness to advertise the distinction on its bronze coinage. The rivalry was less ceremonial than economic: neokorate status brought imperial cult festivals, which drove significant trade and civic revenue.