Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Alexandria Troas (Conventus of Adramyteum) |
|---|---|
| Year | 235-238 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 8.04 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Latin |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Maximinus Thrax never visited Alexandria Troas, but the city minted for him anyway — a routine act of provincial loyalty from a colonia that had held Roman status since Augustus resettled it with veterans. The retrograde COL in the legend is a die-cutter's error, not an intentional variant, and it appears on a small subset of issues from this reign. Whether it left the mint unchecked or simply wasn't considered worth scrapping is unknown, but retrograde colonial abbreviations are uncommon enough that examples are tracked individually in the specialist literature on Troas bronzes.