カタログ
| 発行体 | Crete, Koinon of |
|---|---|
| 年号 | 77 |
| 種類 | Standard circulation coin |
| 額面 | |
| 通貨 | |
| 材質 | Bronze |
| 重量 | 8.23 g |
| 直径 | 22 mm |
| 厚さ | |
| 形状 | Round (irregular) |
| 製造技法 | Hammered |
| 向き | Coin alignment ↑↓ |
| 彫刻師 | |
| 流通終了年 | |
| 参考文献 | II#11 , SvoronosCr#43 |
| 表面の説明 | Bare head of Vespasian, right. |
|---|---|
| 表面の文字体系 | Greek |
| 表面の銘文 | ΑΥΤ ΚΑΙ ΟΥΕΣΠ ΥΠΑ ΤΟ Η |
| 裏面の説明 | Zeus seated, left, with thunderbolt and sceptre. |
| 裏面の文字体系 | |
| 裏面の銘文 | |
| 縁 | |
| 鋳造所 | |
| 鋳造数 |
ND (77) - - |
| Numisquare ID | 1310973930 |
| 追加情報 |
Historical Context: This Æ22, issued by the Koinon of Crete in 77 AD, encapsulates the stability of the early Flavian era under Emperor Vespasian. The obverse legend, ΑΥΤ ΚΑΙ ΟΥΕΣΠ ΥΠΑ ΤΟ Η, precisely dates the coin to Vespasian’s eighth consulship, a period marked by his successful restoration of Roman finances and imperial authority following the tumultuous Year of Four Emperors. Its issuance by a provincial Koinon underscores the widespread adoption of imperial iconography and the integration of regional administrations into the Roman system, affirming loyalty and propagating the emperor’s image across the empire.
Artistry: While the specific engraver remains anonymous, this coin reflects the common Graeco-Roman provincial artistic style of the period. The obverse would have featured a robust, veristic portrait of Vespasian, characteristic of Roman imperial portraiture emphasizing maturity and gravitas. The reverse design, though unspecified, would typically blend imperial themes or local Cretan deities and symbols, demonstrating the provincial mint’s synthesis of Roman authority with regional identity. Such designs, while sometimes less refined than metropolitan issues, were crucial for local circulation and communication.
Technical/Grading: This bronze Æ22, weighing 8.23 grams, exhibits typical characteristics for provincial coinage. High-points susceptible to wear include the emperor's hair, ear, and any drapery folds on the obverse, and the highest relief elements of the reverse motif. Technical strike quality often varies; common issues include slight off-centering, uneven flan preparation, or minor die wear, which can affect the sharpness of legends and finer details. A well-struck example would display clear legends and a strong portrait, though full relief is rare for this module.