Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Cyzicus (Conventus of Cyzicus) |
|---|---|
| Year | 253-260 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | 4.63 g |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Greek |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The misspelling ΚΥΖΙΗΝΩΝ for the expected ΚΥΖΙΚΗΝΩΝ is not a modern cataloger's error — it appears on the die itself, the engraver having dropped the kappa entirely. Cyzicus held neokorate status, the prestigious honor of serving as an official imperial cult center, and the city's pride in advertising that status makes the botched spelling all the more conspicuous. Such lapses are not unknown in provincial bronze production, where die-cutters working under local contracts operated without the standardized oversight of the central Roman mints.