See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

Æ20 - Valerian and Gallienus ϹΑΜ/ΙΩΝ

Issuer Samos (Conventus of Miletus)
Year 253-260
Type Standard circulation coin
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Log in to see details
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Laureate, draped and cuirassed bust of Valerian II facing right, portrayed in three-quarter rear view, with the paludamentum visible over the left shoulder. The portrait is rendered in the provincial Roman style characteristic of the Ionian mint series under the joint reign of Valerian I and Gallienus. A Greek legend encircles the bust, identifying the emperor by his full Roman nomenclature. The flan shows typical irregularity and green patination consistent with struck bronze coinage of the mid-third century AD.
Obverse script Log in to see details
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse script Greek
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Samos minted prolifically under the joint reign of Valerian and Gallienus, exploiting the brief window of imperial co-rule before Valerian's catastrophic capture by Shapur I at the Battle of Edessa in 260 — the first Roman emperor taken prisoner by a foreign enemy. Provincial mints throughout the conventus of Miletus issued coinages honoring both emperors simultaneously, a practice that ceased abruptly when Valerian's capture effectively ended his reign. The precise dating of individual issues within this 253–260 window is difficult; most attributions rely on die study rather than documentary evidence.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE