Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | City of Hierapolis (Conventus of Cibyra) |
|---|---|
| Year | 218-222 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Log in to see details |
| Composition | Bronze |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Two small children (Erotes or putti) seated facing one another, engaged in play with astragaloi (knucklebones), a motif associated with childhood and divine play in the Greco-Roman artistic tradition. The legend ΙΕΠΟΡΑΛΕΙΤΩΝ (sic, for ΙΕΡΑΠΟΛΕΙΤΩΝ) is partially visible around the type, identifying the civic issuing authority. The overall composition is compact and lively, characteristic of the playful genre scenes favored on Phrygian provincial bronzes of the early third century AD. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | ΙΕΠΟΡΑΛΕΙΤΩΝ (sic) (Translation: of the Hierapolitans) |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
The misspelling in the ethnic — ΙΕΠΟΡΑΛΕΙΤΩΝ rather than the expected ΙΕΡΑΠΟΛΕΙΤΩΝ — is not a modern cataloguer's error but appears on the die itself, making it a deliberate or careless cutter's mistake preserved in bronze. Hierapolis in Phrygia issued civic bronze throughout the Severan period under the conventus jurisdiction of Cibyra, one of four assize districts Rome established in the province of Asia. Whether this blundered legend represents a single aberrant die or a broader production run remains an open question in the series.