Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

Æ Unit - Mahindramitra Paurava/Punjab

Uitgever Uncertain Indian mint (India (ancient))
Jaar 100 BC - 1 BC
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Copper
Gewicht Log in om details te zien
Diameter Log in om details te zien
Dikte Log in om details te zien
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Techniek Log in om details te zien
Oriëntatie Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Lion seated to right within the field, a rearing cobra positioned to the right of the animal, a royal parasol depicted above, and a stylized river symbol rendered in the lower field. Traces of a Brahmi legend are visible in the upper field above the principal device. The engraving is characteristic of the punch-marked and die-struck hybrid tradition of the Paurava coinage of the Punjab region, executed in a bold but somewhat schematic style typical of the late pre-Christian era in northwestern India.
Schrift voorzijde Brahmi
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Schrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Rand Log in om details te zien
Muntplaats Log in om details te zien
Oplage Log in om details te zien
Aanvullende informatie

Mahindramitra is among the more obscure dynasts of the post-Mauryan Punjab, known almost entirely through his coinage rather than any textual record. The Paurava designation links him to a regional lineage claiming descent from the ancient Puru confederation — the same line that famously clashed with Alexander at the Hydaspes in 326 BC — though by the first century BC these claims were as much political as genealogical.

Pieper 1386 is sparsely represented in major collections, and attribution to a specific mint remains unresolved.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT