Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | Uncertain Germanic tribes |
|---|---|
| Year | 351-425 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Solidus (circa 301-750) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Latin |
| Obverse lettering | TIIISEPREC - IVNSAIC (Translation: [Dominus Noster Constantius Perpetuus Augustus] [Our Lord, Constantius, perpetual August]) |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Log in to see details |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
These barbarous imitations of late Roman bronze coinage proliferated across the frontier zones during the political fragmentation of the western empire, produced by Germanic groups who needed recognizable currency for trade without access to imperial mint infrastructure. The Constantius II horseman types were among the most widely copied, their bold, simple imagery lending itself to increasingly abstracted local reproduction over successive generations of dies cut by non-specialist hands.
Attribution to a specific tribal group remains impossible without a documented find context. The weight of 4.87g sits above the mean for most imitative pieces, suggesting an earlier casting within this bracket rather than a later, debased iteration.