Katalog
| İhraççı | Arpi (Apulia) |
|---|---|
| Yıl | 325 BC - 275 BC |
| Tür | Standard circulation coin |
| Değer | |
| Para birimi | Drachm |
| Bileşim | Bronze |
| Ağırlık | 2.63 g |
| Çap | 16 mm |
| Kalınlık | |
| Şekil | Round (irregular) |
| Teknik | Hammered |
| Yönlendirme | Variable alignment ↺ |
| Gravürcü(ler) | |
| Dolaşımda olduğu yıl | |
| Referans(lar) | HN Italy#644 , SNG Copenhagen#611 France#1256-1258 , HGC 1#537 |
| Ön yüz açıklaması | Laureate head of Zeus left, sometimes, thunderbolt behind. |
|---|---|
| Ön yüz yazısı | |
| Ön yüz lejandı | |
| Arka yüz açıklaması | Horse galloping left or right; above, star; below, monogram of APΠΙ. |
| Arka yüz yazısı | |
| Arka yüz lejandı | |
| Kenar | |
| Darphane | |
| Basma adedi |
ND (325 BC - 275 BC) - - |
| Numisquare Kimliği | 6014319260 |
| Ek bilgiler |
Historical Context: This Æ was issued by Arpi, a prominent Daunian city in Apulia, during a critical period spanning 325 BC to 275 BC. This era witnessed the waning independence of Greek city-states in Magna Graecia and the burgeoning influence of Rome across the Italian peninsula. The production of such bronze coinage by Arpi underscores its continued civic autonomy and economic vitality, providing essential currency for local commerce amidst shifting regional powers, before its eventual integration into the Roman system.
Artistry: The coin's artistry reflects the Hellenistic stylistic school prevalent in Magna Graecia. While no specific engraver is known, the obverse typically features a laureate head of a prominent deity, such as Zeus, or a chthonic goddess like Persephone, rendered with classical grace. The reverse commonly displays a civic emblem, often an eagle standing or a horse, accompanied by the ethnic legend ARPANON. The overall design adheres to the established iconographic traditions of the late 4th and early 3rd centuries BC, blending local identity with broader Greek artistic conventions.
Technical/Grading: This bronze coin, weighing 2.63 grams and measuring 16 millimeters, represents a common small module. High-points, typically the hair and facial features of the obverse deity or the musculature and feathers of the reverse animal, are often the first areas to show wear or weak striking. Technical strike quality can be inconsistent, with instances of off-centering, incomplete legends, or irregular flans being common due to the rapid production methods for such utilitarian bronzes. Surface preservation is often challenged by environmental factors, leading to varying degrees of patination and corrosion.