See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration! or register with email

Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!

8 Reales Type II Counter-mark

Issuer Guatemala
Year 1839
Type Log in to see details
Value Log in to see details
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Weight Log in to see details
Diameter Log in to see details
Thickness Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Technique Countermarked, Hammered (cob)
Orientation Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description Log in to see details
Obverse script Latin
Obverse lettering Log in to see details
Reverse description Reverse of the hammered cob host coin displaying a large bold cross pattée in high relief, with the characteristic castles and lions of the Spanish royal arms partially visible in the quadrants between the arms of the cross. The flan is irregular and clipped in the typical macuquina fashion, with the design struck off-centre and only partially complete due to the nature of cob coinage production. A green-patinated circular loop or ring is affixed at the lower field, likely a later addition for suspension purposes. The surface shows extensive wear, natural silver patina, and verdigris consistent with a coin of considerable age and circulation.
Reverse script Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Edge Log in to see details
Mint Log in to see details
Mintage Log in to see details
Additional information

Guatemala's counter-marking program of the late 1830s was a direct response to the monetary chaos following Central American federation collapse. Existing 8 reales — often Spanish colonial or Mexican republic issues — were officially stamped to authenticate them for continued circulation under the new Guatemalan state. The Type II counter-mark distinguishes itself from the earlier Type I by its execution and authenticating punch design, though both served identical fiscal purposes during the same fractious period.

Attribution can be complicated by the host coin beneath the stamp, which varies considerably and affects collector valuation independently of the counter-mark itself.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE