目录
查看完整图片 — 免费注册
使用Google继续 — 免费
或用邮箱注册
为什么需要注册？只是为了防止机器人访问我们的目录。您的邮箱完全保密——我们绝不会分享或在未经您许可的情况下发送任何内容。我们向您保证！
| 正面描述 | 登录 以查看详情 |
|---|---|
| 正面文字 | Latin |
| 正面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面描述 | The reverse of this trial piece is an uniface impression of the obverse die, presenting the same Holland crowned coat-of-arms design in incuse mirror relief — the rampant lion on the shield, the mural crown above, and the peripheral Latin legend all appearing in reverse and sunken into the silver flan. This brockage-type effect is characteristic of a trial or proof striking where the obverse die was used on both sides, resulting in a mirror-image incuse repeat of the obverse design on what would normally be the reverse. |
| 背面文字 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 背面铭文 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 边缘 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸币厂 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 铸造量 | 登录 以查看详情 |
| 附加信息 |
In 1670, the Province of Holland experimented with a reduced-weight scheepjesschelling, producing trial strikes to evaluate the proposed type before committing to full production. The scheepjesschelling — named for the small ship that had appeared on Holland provincial coinage since the sixteenth century — was a workhorse denomination in domestic trade, and any adjustment to its weight carried real economic implications for merchants calibrating against accepted silver tariffs.
At 1.14g, this piece sits well below the standard circulation weight, consistent with a uniface or single-die trial rather than a finished coin. The 1670 reform discussions ultimately produced only limited output.