Catalogus
Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!
| Uitgever | Magistrat der Stadt Swinemünde |
|---|---|
| Jaar | 1917-1920 |
| Type | Local banknote |
| Waarde | Log in om details te zien |
| Valuta | Log in om details te zien |
| Samenstelling | Log in om details te zien |
| Afmetingen | Log in om details te zien |
| Vorm | Log in om details te zien |
| Drukker | Log in om details te zien |
| Ontwerper(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Graveur(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| In omloop tot | Log in om details te zien |
| Referentie(s) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving voorzijde | Log in om details te zien |
|---|---|
| Opschrift voorzijde | Nr. GUT FÜR FÜNFZIG PFENNIG Swinemünde, 1. Juni 1920 DER MAGISTRAT 50 Pfennig |
| Beschrijving keerzijde | Printed on cream-white paper with a large orange numeral "50" underprint at centre, flanked above and below by decorative orange guilloche border strips of repeating lozenge ornaments. The main text is set in black letterpress and states the redemption conditions. The printer's imprint "J. C. König & Ebhardt in Hannover" appears in small type at the lower centre margin. |
| Opschrift keerzijde | Log in om details te zien |
| Handtekening(en) | Log in om details te zien |
| Beveiligingstype | Log in om details te zien |
| Beschrijving beveiliging | Log in om details te zien |
| Varianten | Log in om details te zien |
| Opmerkingen |
Swinemünde — now Świnoujście, Poland — was a busy Baltic port town under German administration when this Notgeld piece was issued. Emergency municipal currency of this kind proliferated across Germany after 1914 as small-denomination coins vanished from circulation, hoarded by a public increasingly distrustful of the wartime economy. The Magistrat here contracted J. C. König & Ebhardt, a well-established Hannover printing house with deep roots in quality paper and stationery production — an unsurprising choice for a municipality wanting something more credible than the crude cardboard scrip many smaller towns were producing.
The watermarked paper is worth noting: not all Notgeld issues bothered with security features, and its presence here suggests the Magistrat was concerned about local counterfeiting or at minimum wanted to project institutional legitimacy during an unstable period.