Volledige afbeeldingen bekijken — gratis registratie
Doorgaan met Google — het is gratis of registreer met e-mail

Waarom registreren? Alleen om bots buiten ons catalogus te houden. Uw e-mail blijft privé — we delen het nooit en sturen u niets zonder uw toestemming. Dat garanderen wij u!

50 Pfennig

Uitgever Rat der Stadt Feldberg (Mecklenburg)
Jaar 1922
Type Log in om details te zien
Waarde Log in om details te zien
Valuta Log in om details te zien
Samenstelling Log in om details te zien
Afmetingen 112 × 75 mm
Vorm Log in om details te zien
Drukker Log in om details te zien
Ontwerper(s) Log in om details te zien
Graveur(s) Log in om details te zien
In omloop tot Log in om details te zien
Referentie(s) Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving voorzijde Salmon-pink Notgeld note printed in dark brown, with the left half occupied by a detailed pen-and-ink style vignette of tall birch trees rising from a grassy hillside, with a distant landscape visible at lower right; the artist's signature appears at lower left of the vignette. The right half carries a three-stanza romantic wandering poem in Gothic script, numbered '1' below the text. The lower margin presents the denomination '50 PF.' in large bold numerals at each corner flanking a central text panel, above the issuing authority's name and a manuscript Bürgermeister signature.
Opschrift voorzijde Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving keerzijde Log in om details te zien
Opschrift keerzijde 50 PFENNIG 50
REUTERGELD DER STADT
FELDBERG i. M.
Handtekening(en) Log in om details te zien
Beveiligingstype Log in om details te zien
Beschrijving beveiliging Log in om details te zien
Varianten Log in om details te zien
Opmerkingen

Feldberg's 1922 notgeld issue belongs to the second wave of German municipal emergency currency — not the wartime scarcity issues of 1914–18, but the inflationary stopgap series produced as Reichsmark coinage vanished from circulation hoarding and melting. The Rat der Stadt Feldberg, a small Mecklenburg town council with no particular banking infrastructure, was simply authorized to print what the Reichsbank could not supply in small denominations fast enough.

Mecklenburg notgeld from this period is less studied than the elaborate "collector" series from larger towns, which were frankly printed as souvenirs. Feldberg's issue shows no such ambition.

MISSCHIEN OOK INTERESSANT