Catalog
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
| Issuer | China (ancient) |
|---|---|
| Year | 322-324 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Zhu (original continued, 25-618) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Weight | Log in to see details |
| Diameter | Log in to see details |
| Thickness | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Technique | Log in to see details |
| Orientation | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Log in to see details |
|---|---|
| Obverse script | Log in to see details |
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Fully anepigraphic reverse, mirroring the obverse in its complete absence of inscription, legend, or decorative motif. The annular field surrounding the central square hole is unadorned, with a slightly irregular rim resulting from the ancient sand- or clay-mould casting process. The surface displays a heterogeneous patina of dark brown and bluish-grey tones with minor encrustations, consistent with archaeological recovery. No inner rim line, no outer rim line, and no secondary design elements are present. This plain reverse reinforces the classification of the type as a deliberately uninscribed emergency or transitional issue. |
| Reverse script | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Edge | Plain |
| Mint | Log in to see details |
| Mintage | Log in to see details |
| Additional information |
Shen Chong's regime lasted barely two years. His 322–324 rebellion against the Eastern Jin court in Jiankang was crushed by Wang Dun's forces, and the anepigraphic issues attributed to his administration — coins struck without inscription, presumably to avoid the political liability of a legible reign name — survive in tiny numbers. The Gratzer reference places this squarely among the least-documented bronzes of the Eastern Jin fragmentation period, a classification Hartill never formally assigned.