See full images — free registration
Continue with Google — it's free or register with email

5 Skilling

Issuer Grønlands Administration
Year 1941
Type Log in to see details
Value 5 Skilling
Currency Log in to see details
Composition Log in to see details
Size Log in to see details
Shape Log in to see details
Printer Log in to see details
Designer(s) Log in to see details
Engraver(s) Log in to see details
In circulation to Log in to see details
Reference(s) Log in to see details
Obverse description The obverse is divided into two panels: a left panel bearing a faint oval underprint vignette, and a right panel with the issuer name "Grønlands Administration" in script lettering beneath a royal crown vignette at top centre. The denomination numeral "5" is printed in large bold type at centre right, flanked by the bilingual inscriptions "HandelsVærdimærke" and "Trade Certificate". The outer border carries a repeated guilloche ornament with the numeral "5" at each corner and the issuer name in capital letters along the top and bottom margins.
Obverse lettering GRØNLANDS ADMINISTRATION
Grønlands Administration
Handels Værdimærke
5
Trade Certificate
5 Skilling
Reverse description Log in to see details
Reverse lettering Log in to see details
Signature(s) Log in to see details
Protection type Log in to see details
Protection description Log in to see details
Variants Log in to see details
Comments

Greenland's wartime isolation produced some of the most improvised currency anywhere in the Western world. After German occupation of Denmark in April 1940 cut off normal administrative supply lines, the island's governor Aksel Svane authorized emergency notes using whatever materials were locally available. This 5 Skilling piece is among the simplest emergency issues of the Second World War — printed under extremely limited conditions with no access to security printing facilities.

The skilling denomination itself was archaic by 1941, long obsolete in Danish monetary usage, which gives the series an almost accidental quality, as if the choice of unit reflected administrative improvisation rather than deliberate policy.