Catalog
See full images - free registration
Continue with Google - no registration!
or register with email
Why register? Just to keep bots out of our catalog. Your email stays private - we will never share it or send you anything uninvited. We guarantee you that!
5 Shillings Sterling
| Issuer | Hudson's Bay Company |
|---|---|
| Year | 1832-1866 |
| Type | Log in to see details |
| Value | Log in to see details |
| Currency | Pound sterling (1694-date) |
| Composition | Log in to see details |
| Size | Log in to see details |
| Shape | Log in to see details |
| Printer | Log in to see details |
| Designer(s) | Log in to see details |
| Engraver(s) | Log in to see details |
| In circulation to | Log in to see details |
| Reference(s) | Log in to see details |
| Obverse description | Printed in red ink on aged paper, the note bears the issuer's title HUDSONS BAY COMPANY across the upper portion, above a handwritten promise-to-pay text specifying Five Shillings Sterling at York Factory in Rupert's Land. A small armorial vignette appears in the upper left corner, alongside a manuscript serial number repeated twice in the left margin; the lower portion carries manuscript signatures of the Secretary and Accountant, with a handwritten issue date. |
|---|---|
| Obverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Reverse description | Log in to see details |
| Reverse lettering | Log in to see details |
| Signature(s) | Log in to see details |
| Protection type | Log in to see details |
| Protection description | Log in to see details |
| Variants | S1097b - dated 27.05.1832 to 25.08.1840 S1097c - dated 01.05.1845 to 01.03.1866 |
| Comments |
Hudson's Bay Company notes occupy a peculiar legal position: the HBC was not a bank and had no charter to issue currency, yet it did so anyway across its vast territories in Rupert's Land where no chartered banking infrastructure existed. The Company's notes circulated as a practical necessity among fur traders, Indigenous peoples, and settlers who had no other reliable medium of exchange. Colonial authorities largely looked the other way.
The thirty-four year date span on this issue reflects continuous reuse of the same plate stock rather than distinct series changes — notes were dated by hand at the time of signing, with senior Company officers providing manuscript authorization.