Katalog
| Emitent | Bentheim-Tecklenburg-Rheda, County of |
|---|---|
| Rok | 1674 |
| Typ | Standard circulation coin |
| Hodnota | 5 Pfennigs (5 Pfennige) (1⁄72) |
| Měna | Thaler (1606-1806) |
| Složení | Billon |
| Hmotnost | |
| Průměr | |
| Tloušťka | |
| Tvar | Round |
| Technika | |
| Orientace | |
| Rytci | |
| V oběhu do | |
| Reference | KM#90, Kennepohl#118 |
| Popis líce | Helmet in wreath. |
|---|---|
| Písmo líce | |
| Opis líce | |
| Popis rubu | 3-line inscription with denomination, date and mintmasters initials. |
| Písmo rubu | |
| Opis rubu | 1674 // * V * // G.T.P. |
| Hrana | |
| Mincovna | |
| Náklad |
1674 - - |
| ID Numisquare | 1455197090 |
| Další informace |
Historical Context: The 1674 5 Pfennig of Bentheim-Tecklenburg-Rheda was issued during Count Moritz's nascent reign (1674-1704). This post-Thirty Years' War era saw numerous small principalities like Bentheim-Tecklenburg-Rheda asserting economic autonomy via minting rights. Such low-denomination billon coinage was vital for daily transactions, reflecting local economic needs and the ruler's prerogative to maintain a circulating medium amidst complex regional currencies. This coin thus serves as a tangible record of a minor German county's economic self-sufficiency during a period of reconstruction and consolidation.
Artistry: The engraver for this modest billon issue remains anonymous, typical for regional Pfennig production. The design adheres to a pragmatic late-Renaissance/early-Baroque aesthetic, prioritizing clarity over elaborate detail given the small flan and base metal. Common motifs include the ruler's monogram, likely 'M' for Moritz, often crowned, on the obverse, and a simplified county shield or the denomination and date on the reverse, executed with functional precision. The artistic merit lies in its legibility and adherence to established numismatic conventions of the time rather than intricate embellishment.
Technical/Grading: As a billon issue, this 5 Pfennig typically exhibits characteristics inherent to its composition. High-points for wear or strike weakness are often observed on the crown (if present), the central elements of the monogram, and the highest relief of any armorial device. Strikes are frequently inconsistent, with common occurrences of off-centering or planchet irregularities. Full details, particularly around legends, are rare, making a sharply struck example highly desirable for its preservation among these regional issues. Surface integrity is also a key factor, as billon can be prone to corrosion or environmental damage.